SOLAR DISTILLED WATER FRESNEL LENS WATER FILTRATION SYSTEM CLEAN DRINKING WATER Solar Distiller.
These Water filtration systems offer an alternative to water damage cause by several causes. This solar distiller can creat water deliver of .5 GPH www.greenpowerscience.com There are a lot of websites that quote the same incorrect information regarding distilled water in soda and mineral leaching. If this were true, and it is not, the aluminum would be leached and water with sugar, or artificial sweetener would become heavy. If you are concerned, add 10mg Na to each liter. Also, eating food with water, all minerals are mixed with fluid in the stomach converting distilled water into mineral water. Distilled water is not magic, if you add a splash of milk to tea made with distilled water, you now have 10x the calcium of regular mineral water. www.eves-best.com Distilled water is very good for you. The only areas it may cause a problem is developing nations that have near famine conditions. For the rest of the world who usually ingest 15x the sodium recommended, distilled water leaches salt first. ONLY IF you are salt deprived (extremely rare) will distilled water leach excess potassium and or calcium. You would need to drink about 2 gallons in 10 hours for there to be a problem. If heavy sweating, water of any kind is only a thirst quencher or temporary fluid fix. Most people can afford 7 pounds of sweat (near gallon) replaced with only water before electrolytes become an issue. At that point, electrolytes are needed regardless of water type ingested. Mineral water has …
Link933 says:
April 19th, 2010 at 9:58 am
i am planning to do the same experiment in school. Will it work with one of those fersnel lenses used in cars, school busses etc.? The lense is about 25x20cm. Is it enough?
Libyandreamsgone says:
April 19th, 2010 at 10:41 am
great vid thanx, i am thinking about using solar tubes or light tubes to collect the sunlight energy and then u can imagine the amount of energy we can have at that moment , thanx from libya
stooopiddogballs says:
April 19th, 2010 at 10:49 am
what did it taste like copper
B1u3Dr4g0n1 says:
April 19th, 2010 at 11:44 am
@GREENPOWERSCIENCE …Swamp water….LOL
commandercody1215 says:
April 19th, 2010 at 12:06 pm
Thanks!!!Now when im out in the middle nowhere i can get Clean Water!!!!!!
vide00210 says:
April 19th, 2010 at 12:20 pm
Sound is poor…
vide00210 says:
April 19th, 2010 at 12:33 pm
Xactly!
This is an answer.
vide00210 says:
April 19th, 2010 at 1:14 pm
Dude, I knew this is the way to make ALCOHOL, but not water. By the way, from all those dirty-swan water, how much Alcohol can you make?
social3ngin33rin says:
April 19th, 2010 at 2:08 pm
Poor little guys :’(
I need to buy a fresnel lens : /
I’m just scared of it breaking!!! (money)
or setting me on fire lol
High quality H2O- subscripts weren’t working :’(
deChrLam says:
April 19th, 2010 at 2:37 pm
“Blast of ultraviolet”
Ultraviolet light does not penetrate glass.
“Filtration”
is very different to distillation
Apart from the two misnomers cool vid
pshinspections says:
April 19th, 2010 at 2:57 pm
The only part you forgot was to use a sediment filter (towel, shirt, etc) before doing anything else. That would have gotten rid of most visible particulates.
bluediamond2077 says:
April 19th, 2010 at 3:10 pm
not at all. the water goes into the sky and your left with dirtier water in the pot
KanadianKain says:
April 19th, 2010 at 3:26 pm
boilling gets rid of the solid toxics (flouride and stuff) but i know fo other liquid (or bacteria toxins) can be filtered out, i think cheap charcoal filters work fine.
with distillation, and charcoal filter, i ‘think’ you get 100% pure water.
BeeRich33 says:
April 19th, 2010 at 4:01 pm
Any chance you could estimate how long it took (minus interruption)? I’m assuming that’s about 1.5 litres of water? Just setting some raw numbers into mental notes.
TW93AW says:
April 19th, 2010 at 4:26 pm
Does the fresnel lens have to be big to work like that or can a A4 size have the same effect or at least enough to distill water?
TheKlink says:
April 19th, 2010 at 4:47 pm
@DigGil1 Nothing’s 100% clear, you’d be better off with 2 fresnel lenses side by side shining on an apropriatly designed prism. your way, you’d simply be magnifying the same light twice.
stoichiometric says:
April 19th, 2010 at 5:31 pm
Yep!
dpmlybsk says:
April 19th, 2010 at 5:51 pm
Considering the fact that the water was collected from a swamp it got to have a lot of dissolved and undissolved organic substances some of them being volatile, and also some methane formed by the decomposition of organic matter. Won’t these volatile substances and gases pass along with the steam? Not sure if they are toxic but they sure can make the water foul smelling. Use of permanganate or some other strong oxidizing agent in the water while distilling may solve the problem.
ginodelia says:
April 19th, 2010 at 6:08 pm
THANKS.GOD BLESS YOU.
netwerkthis says:
April 19th, 2010 at 6:12 pm
Couldnt you also do this for sea water — Haiti ?
MrsBooker100 says:
April 19th, 2010 at 7:01 pm
Isn’t boiling your regular tap water the same as distilling?
crimberland says:
April 19th, 2010 at 7:18 pm
contaminates found in the country cover a wide range of metals found in pesticides to make it last longer and in some instances in america have found barium. Honestly, will boiling it get rid of the metals and pollutants. Sadly our bodies dont use a fraction of the minerals you drink compared to when you eat. Lucky for you because youd be drinking boiled animals exits and god knows what crap they eat or what little swap rat died in the water. Distill is always the best option if you have it.
agile1111 says:
April 19th, 2010 at 7:51 pm
Water in the middle of a swamp in the country is unlikely to have chemical toxins. Boiling it kills the biological organisms and makes it relatively safe. Do your homework before you make stupid comments idiot.
DigGil1 says:
April 19th, 2010 at 8:35 pm
Let’s imagine you set up Fresnel #1 like in the video. Then you set #2 at the focal point of #1. When light reaches #2 it won’t cover the whole Fresnel, obviously. Theoretically, the light at #2 is like the next full stop I wrote. I don’t think it will melt the lens because its material is transparent. Most probably it will disperse the light further than without #2.
keneyed209 says:
April 19th, 2010 at 8:57 pm
how would it work if you put 2 FRESNEL LENS together at a measured distances could that straighten the beam like a telescope maybe or would it melt the other lens?